Sunday, March 30, 2025

Διαφορά

I was reading The Greek Conquerors by Lionel Casson today and was struck by something. Ancient Greek art has the reputation for a precise kind of beauty: the golden ratio and all that. Greece is where the "classical" in "neoclassical" comes from. 

It wasn't always like that, though. Mycenaean artifacts, whether painted, sculpted or carved, are quite different. In some cases they're gorgeous, but their perspective is quite naive. Case in point:


After a few centuries we see greater detail, more of an understanding of perspective.


What caused the change? Maybe it was a foreign influence. Maybe some people just had more leisure time. The only obvious conclusion is that things were in flux.

1 comment:

susan said...

I love looking at images of Mycenaean and Minoan artworks but I can't say I've thought much about how the styles developed over time. It's certain that the Golden Mean was a great discovery that would never have arrived without the appreciation of beauty and form in nature.

The Minoans preceeded the Mycenaean. When I indulged in a little Minoan art history, saddened as always that so little is left to us to study, I came across a quote from R. Higgins, an art historian:

Perhaps the greatest contribution of the Bronze Age to Classical Greece was something less tangible; but quite possibly inherited: an attitude of mind which could borrow the formal and hieratic arts of the East and transform them into something spontaneous and cheerful; a divine discontent which led the Greek ever to develop and improve his inheritance.