Somewhere in the depths of prehistory...
In the 1980s the Internet was...what? Unenet? Obscure proto-wikis by and for specialists? Physicists on opposite coasts playing modified chess on a screen over the course of five weeks? Above all it was slow, with still primitive graphics. Computers were the future, we heard at school, but in many ways the future seemed to be taking its sweet time.
As the centuries and millennia turned, the order began to change for real. High-speed internet and workable video dawned. And so everything started to go online, including things that had seemed entirely grounded in the physical world. Leftwing newsweeklies. Avid fan clubs. Underfunded museums of bizarre stuff. And why not? The 'net was open frontier. There was plenty of room for freaks and individualists.
Well, there was and then there wasn't. The Internet, once optimized, had the potential to be history's greatest sales medium. Eventually that potential was realized and a handful of giant businesses had established control. New rules were enacted, leaving a lot less room for spontaneity and eccentricity. But the really sad part was that the weirdos weren't driven out. With very few exceptions they just went along, becoming enforcers when a suitable occasion―pandemic, say―came along.
Sam Kriss gets at a lot of this in a penetrating essay I found through Twitter.
These days, the mantra of the good progressive types is not question everything, but in this house we believe. Believe the science, believe the experts, believe in our institutions, believe women. Liberals no longer think ordinary people should get to interrogate the big questions for themselves: your Google search is not the same as my medical degree. They don’t think corporate media is inherently propagandistic: it’s our last bulwark against online disinformation. They don’t even oppose the totalizing effect of mass culture: they just want culture-commodities to carry the right kind of didactic messaging. Along the way, an entire language has vanished, a whole stock of concepts has fallen out of use. Who, in 2022, bothers railing against conformity? Who wants to talk about alienation? Who is trying to shock us with their bold critiques of consumerism?
The immediate occasion for Kriss's piece is the release of a new Matrix movie. Now as to the original, I found Fight Club to be a more interesting distillation of end-of-millennium anomie. And since David Cronenberg was an old hand at spinning obscure critical theories into monster movies, eXistenZ had a certain home field advantage. Yet The Matrix had an undeniable impact, popularizing postmodern philosophy and a kind of tech savvy Gnosticism. But the party may be over now that another kind constantly runs in the background.